Risk of Intraocular Lens Opacification After Endothelial Keratoplasty for Different Intraocular Lens Models: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to calculate the specific risk of opacification for different intraocular lens (IOL) models and to determine whether differences exist, even between lenses made of similar acrylic materials. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent endothelial keratoplasty (EK), either after or in conjunction with cataract surgery, from June 2009 to October 2020 at Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-two eyes of 308 patients with a median follow-up of 856 days [interquartile range (IQR): 384-1570] were included, of which 128 IOLs were hydrophobic, 120 hydrophilic, and 124 unknown. 12.9% of IOLs opacified after a median of 466 days (IQR: 255-743). Visual acuity (VA) was significantly lower in the opacified IOL group [0.51 (IQR: 0.36-1.13)] compared with the nonopacified group [0.22 (IQR: 0.11-0.65)] ( P < 0.001). IOL explantation and exchange was performed in 10 eyes, in which VA improved markedly, from 1.75 (IQR: 0.99-3.00) to 0.60 (IQR: 0.36-0.86) ( P = 0.004). IOL material and opacification events were not independent ( P < 0.001). Significant differences were found between the Akreos ADAPT AO and MI60P models and the Asphina 409M model ( P = 0.022). No significant differences were found in the opacification ratio for hydrophilic IOLs in the clinical diagnosis ( P = 0.11), the type of EK ( P = 0.25), the rebubbling rate ( P = 0.44), or the tamponade used ( P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Hydrophilic lenses should be avoided in patients at risk of requiring EK. It is important to know the probability of opacification of each IOL model to balance risk and benefits when planning an EK procedure because not all lenses opacify equally. Opacification is an unwanted event with a negative impact on VA, making IOL explantation and exchange the only viable treatment, although one that is not without risks.

Application of multicolour reflectance imaging for the characterisation of inherited retinal disorders.

AIM: To describe the role of multicolour reflectance images (MCI) in the phenotypic diagnosis of inherited retinal disorders (IRDs). METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients affected by IRDs examined with MCI techniques from January to December 2019 at a tertiary care referral centre. All patients had MCI, fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography taken at the same time point. The ability of each modality to highlight clinical features was assessed. Lesions' size was also measured and compared among imaging modalities. RESULTS: Thirty eyes of 15 patients were included in the study, 6 males and 9 females, with a mean age of 44 years (range: 19-57.5). The most frequent clinical diagnosis were: pattern dystrophies, and late-onset retinal degeneration. Next-generation or Sanger sequencing analysis was carried out in all patients. Blue and green reflectance were relevant in highlighting peripheral mottling in fundus albipunctatus, pseudoreticular drusen in late-onset retinal degeneration, parafoveal hyperreflective area in bull's eye maculopathy and crystals in Bietti's crystalline dystrophy. Likewise, it is to mention the ability of infrared reflectance to detect hyperreflective patches in posterior pole in neurofibromatosis type 1 and retinal changes in pattern dystrophies and cone dystrophies. CONCLUSION: Multicolour imaging technique enables the detection of clinical features that could be overlooked by other imaging modalities, allowing accurate phenotypic characterisation of IRDs and guiding genetic diagnose, and may become a meaningful monitoring tool for future treatments.